Compare LunaRoute
There are good inference providers out there, and some will fit you better than we do. These pages compare LunaRoute with each one honestly. They show where each is stronger.
Comparisons
LunaRoute vs OpenRouter
One API for hundreds of models, including closed ones, billed per token across many providers. Compared with one serving setup per model at a fixed price.
LunaRoute vs Together AI
A full AI cloud with fine-tuning and dedicated GPUs, billed per token or per GPU-hour. Compared with a focused, fixed-price service with zero data retention by default for LunaRoute-hosted inference.
LunaRoute vs Fireworks AI
A high-performance platform where you choose GPUs and precision, billed per token or per GPU-second. Compared with a managed setup tuned for agents.
LunaRoute vs Featherless
A huge open-model catalog with a flat Chat plan for human-driven use only, plus per-token Developer plans for agents. Compared with flat plans that include agents and Claude Code.
The short version
Most providers bill per token, so the bill grows with every step, retry and long context an agent runs. For included inference, LunaRoute charges a fixed monthly price for how many requests run at once.
If your use is light, per-token pricing usually costs less. If your agents run all day, a fixed price is easier to live with. Concurrency vs token pricing explains the difference in detail.
See if it fits your workload
Setup is one command, and the price for included inference stays the same however long your agents run.